When billing through MN-ITS, there's a very handy feature that pretty much guarantees no sent claims will be denied.  If I bill in MN-ITS, before sending the claim, I have the option to "Validate" each claim to ensure there are no errors.  If after validating a claim finds an error, I immediately get notified of the error code, so I can fix, re-validate, and resend when no errors are found.

This has been extremely helpful to ensure predictable cash-flow when billing, and completely eliminates the possibility of errors when sending in claims.

Is it possible for something like this to be implemented in Procentive?

Procentive Has Encountered an Error

You have encountered a part of the program that is experiencing errors. Procentive makes every effort to correct errors. If this problem persists, please click the "Show Detail" button and send the contents to the Help Desk along with the following code: ec2-18-221-44-155.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com1195013878

Does anyone know if there is an option to email statements to clients?

Thanks

Ucare is denying Residential claims due to no Value 24 Code being listed on the claim. After speaking with Ucare, a number of times, we are continually hearing that V24 code has to be in box 39 on the UB-04 claim. Is anyone else being told this? 

Procentive is telling us that V24 codes can only go out on MA claims. 

Are we alone in this issue? 

We have been receiving some information/advice on how to properly bill for a comprehensive assessment and also bill for intakes in our  new chemical dependency program.

Our thought is to use code H0001 for the comprehensive assessment itself, but we have also been advised that there should be a billing for group time.

Can anyone provide some insight on why group would be billed as well?  If billing for time spent on the comprehensive assessment is allowed, shouldn't that be billed as individual?

Does anyone add a surcharge for credit card payments?  I'm wondering how you set that up in Procentive. 

Thanks

Thought this might be helpful... I've added the authorization # of 88888888888 to the authorization field for our MA payer and submitted claims for Direct Access services, and they show as set to pay. I know from talking with others there were ideas around adding a new payer in order to accommodate one payer that can include authorization numbers on claims (Rule 25 clients with SA #s) and a separate payer that can exclude authorization numbers on claims (Direct Access clients)..

DAANES authorization numbers default to 8888888888 and using that on claims seems like it will work, allowing one MA payer, where Rule 25 clients can have actual SA #s (as they always did) and Direct Access clients can have the default authorization number of 88888888888.

It looks like there are going to be many changes in order to bill MNITS for 1002, H2036 and H2035. Is Procentive aware of these changes and updated the software accordingly?

We have enrolled in Medicare (only one provider so far...) and need to determine if we need any modifiers for regular mental health codes, and/or how documentation is provided to Medicare if needed - anyone been billing Medicare and have some insight?